This free survey is powered by
  1. Surveys
  2. 2014
  3. April
  4. T
  5. Teacher Perceptions of ReadLive
0%
Exit Survey
 
 
Hello:

You are invited to participate in our survey to investigate teacher perceptions of the Web-Based Read Naturally Live Program. In this survey, you will be asked to complete questions about your perceptions of the program.

Your participation in this study is completely voluntary. There are no foreseeable risks associated with this project. However, if you feel uncomfortable answering any questions, you can withdraw from the survey at any point. It is very important to learn your opinions.

Your survey responses will be strictly confidential. Your information will be coded and will remain confidential. If you have questions at any time about the survey or the procedures, you may contact Kelly Crockett at the following email address [email protected]

Thank you very much for your time and support.

 
 
 
What is your current teaching assignment?
 
2nd Grade
 
3rd Grade
 
4th Grade
 
5th Grade
 
Other
 
 
 
 
How many years have you been teaching?
 
1-3 years
 
4-10 years
 
11-20 years
 
More than 20 years
 
 
 
What is your education level?
 
Bachelor's Degree
 
Master's Degree
 
Master's Degree or more
 
Some College
 
 
Please rate the following statements regarding your familiarity with the Web-Based Read Naturally Live Program:
Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
I have had adequate training for the Read Naturally Live Program.
If I have a question about the program, there is sufficient support to help me.
I feel comfortable using the Read Naturally Live Program.
 
 
Please rate the following statements regarding the effectiveness of the Web-Based Read Naturally Live Program:
Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
The Read Naturally Live Program is beneficial to students.
The Read Naturally Live Program is better than the previously used intervention program.
The Read Naturally Live Program is improving my students reading abilities.
The Read Naturally Live Program is a good way to supplement reading instruction.
The Read Naturally Live Program is aligned with DIBELS testing.
The Read Naturally Live Program is aligned with current reading standards.
 
 
 
In your opinion, what are the characteristics of an effective reading intervention program?
   
 
 
 
What features of the Read Naturally Live Program are most effective at increasing students' reading abilities?
   
 
 
 
What features of the Read Naturally Live Program are the least effective at increasing students' reading abilities?
   
 
 
 
Do you think we should continue to use the Read Naturally Live Program? Why or why not?