Mission 2019

Theme 1: Human Resources Development Policies

Brief: This is the most crucial sector for creating intellectual entrepreneurship to guide the nation toward future development. Since the independence of Bharat, this sector is ruled by so-called leftists and secularists. They have attempted to destroy our cultural heritage and values. The department of Human Resources Development governs many institutions such as University Grants Commission, Indian Council of Historical Research (ICHR), Indian Council of Social Science Research (ICSSR), Indian Council of Philosophical Research (ICPR), etc. Revolutionary changes in these institutions and policies would change the face of Bharatiya intellectual and philosophical thought bank.

Suggested Examples:

1. Change the history curricula of school and college textbooks. By introducing alternative or India centric view of history and humanities based on new discoveries in this field.
2. Introduce a Ph.D. program in Hinduism and Bharatiya Philosophies.
3. Make crucial appointments to the HRD institutes.

Theme 2: Foreign Policy

Bharat’s current foreign policy framework is adopted from colonial rule that was continued by the Congress foreign relation bureau established in 1925. Behaviour of our staff in Indian missions overseas reflects that colonial mindset. This bureau was converted into the Ministry of External Affairs in 1947 and a majority of policies were introduced by Jawaharlal Nehru. Non-alignment was a dreamy concept introduced by Nehru along with Fidel Castro and Gamal Abdel Nasser to keep the two warring camps of the United States and the USSR equidistant. A permanent seat in the U.N. Security Council was given up in favor of China with that same romantic notion, thus losing a golden opportunity to be at the top table to mould world opinion. We have been struggling for years to regain that coveted seat. Nehru’s policies have not yielded good results for the nation. Now, the time has come to replace the non-alignment, non-aggression, non-interference in domestic affairs policies of Nehru. We need to take clues from Chanakya, Lalitaditya, Chandragupta Vikramaditya and King Raja Raja Chola’s geopolitical outreach policies to frame Bharat’s new foreign policy framework. For example, Raja Raja Chola utilized cultural and Dharmic invasion to expand the Dharmic Empire around the world.

Suggested Examples:
1. Introduce Kautilya as part of curriculum for IFS, IAS, IPS training.
2. Indian consulates need to be sensitized to the needs of person of Indian origins (PIOs) as well as tourists and must treat them as honored guests not a nuisance.

Theme 3: Foreign Aid

Bharat is emerging as a global donor as per its Dharmic duty to humanity and to enhance its global reputation. For FY 2013-14, the government sets aside nearly $1.3 billion for foreign assistance. This assistance is focused on technical cooperation. It also makes sizable contributions to multilateral organizations including the United Nations Development Programs, the World Health Organization, and others. These kinds of organizations are being used by Christian organizations to expand their base to help the Christian nations. Although Bharat’s foreign assistance program has grown recently, an agency in the style of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) is not being established. USAID gives billions of dollars to churches around the world to expand its influence through Christianity and keep all its interests intact.

Suggested Example: Bharat has pledged US$260 million in aid for building 49,000 homes in Sri Lanka’s war zone. We believe that the aid should be given to Dharmic and Seva organizations engaged in rehabilitation work.

Theme 4: Engagements with Media

Gujarat elections and many others have witnessed unaccountable money paid to mercenary sections of media by Saudi Arabia, European countries, and many Western countries to discredit Shri Narendra Modi and Dharmic organizations, which they did very faithfully, though with only limited success. Several major publishing groups in Bharat such as the Times of India Group, the Hindustan Times Group, The Hindu group, the Anandbazar Patrika Group, the Malayalam Manorama Group, and the Mathrubhumi group are either owned by as profit commercial enterprise by self centred Indians, foreigners, Christian missionaries, and Muslim nations and managed by communists, leftists, pseudo seculars. For example, it is widely believed that NDTV is funded by a Christian organization in Spain, and CNN-IBN is also funded by a church organization. Now, media in Bharat are being more and more controlled by the Western nations after the government allowed Foreign Direct Investment (FDI).

Suggested Example:
1.Government can support or promote indigenous media efforts.
2. An Autonomous Ombudsman or Media Lokpal may be introduced.

Theme 5: South Asian Policies

India is a vast geographical nation-state sharing borders, both land and maritime, with several countries. India’s relations with these neighbors are of love and hate. In a majority of cases, the neighbors turn hostile. Pakistan continues to engage the Army in Kashmir and insurgents infiltrate the porous and volatile border; there have been other disturbances within the Bharat mainland, too. Chinese incursions in Ladakh and Arunachal Pradesh are not new as a part of its aggressive expansion. India seems to have been totally outmaneuvered by China’s grand strategy and diplomatic moves.

In addition to the geostrategic issues, people of Dharmic origin are being treated inhumanely. In 1991-92, the Government of Bhutan drove out 110,000 Nepali-speaking Hindus who had been living there since time immemorial. In 2007, the Government of Bharat handed over foreign policy powers to Bhutan that has caused numerous problems for Bharat while on the other hand it withdrew some economic support, alienating itself and helping China make inroads in Bhutan. The new government seriously needs to look into its Bhutan policy. Also, atrocities on Dharmic people (Hindu and Sikhs) in Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Bangladesh are at their peak. The UPA government has not shown any courage to stop the atrocities. India let Nepal slip out of its friendly hand with shortsighted vision and it went into the hands of Maoists who are clearly anti-India. Thus, South Asia policy successes of Bharat are most needed.

Suggested Examples:
1. Revoke Bhutan’s foreign-policy-making privileges;
2. Allow Hindu and Sikh students of Pakistan and Bangladesh to study in Bharat for higher education.
3. Review an import policy for China. If necessary, the volume of bilateral trade should be reduced to the level of NDA government policy.

Theme 6: Foreign Funding in Bharat

Many NGOs in Bharat receive funds from both foreign governments and private institutions. According to the Home Ministry's Annual Report 2010-11, the most recent period for which data are available, about 22,000 NGOs received a total of more than Rs. 12,000 crores ($2 billion) from abroad. Some Rs. 81,303 crores were received in foreign donations mostly by Christian NGOs in the last 10 years. These NGOs are involved in “Breaking the India nexus” in the name of human rights, public interests, environmental activism, education, etc. The most notable example is the Kundankulam Nuclear Power Plant protests. The NGOs’ funds were spent to oppose the plant and now, C Udaykumar, a Christian who led a protest against this plant, is a candidate of the Aam Adami Party.

Suggested Examples: Strict compliance to the Foreign Contribution Regulation Act rules is recommended. No funds for religious bodies would be allowed, and any institution using funds even indirectly for conversions would be de-recognized and disbanded.Revoke special Visa facility for missionaries introduced by UPA recently.

Theme 7: Control of Minority Institutions

Minorities (Christians and Muslims) have been given free rein in Bharat to establish their institutions even though, historically, they are not oppressed. Minorities have built various institutions across Bharat in the last 1,000 years. In the last 10 years, minority universities are being built Tirupati (Andhra Pradesh), Kishanganj (Aligarh Muslim University Campus), Rai Bareli (Uttar Pradesh), Srirangapatna (Karnataka). These are supported by the UPA government. All institutions, whether minority or majority, must have uniform laws controlling them. There cannot be two sets of rules for majority and minority communities as it goes against the principles of secularism.

Suggested Examples: Universalize all educational initiatives such as scholarships, reservations, the building of new minority institutes, etc.and discontinue minority focused aid and privileges. Central Government Funded Minority Educational Institutions should not be exempted from RTE act i.e. accommodating weaker sections of the society in their institutions under RTE is not mandatory as per recent Supreme Court ruling.

Theme 8: Cultural Intelligence

Cultural intelligence (CI)—a combination of cultural knowledge and warfare refers to the cognitive, motivational, and behavioral capacities to understand and effectively respond to the beliefs, values, attitudes, and behaviors of individuals, communities, and states under complex and changing circumstances in order to effect a desired change.

CI was central to ensuring successful military operations; however, it is being used for business intelligence, strategic interests, and many other functions. Culture is composed of factors including language, society, economy, customs, history, and religion. CI is to make decisions based on an understanding of these factors. CI is a complicated pursuit of anthropology, psychology, communications, sociology, history, and above all, military doctrine.

In Bharat, the Indian Council for Cultural Relations (ICCR) is responsible for cultural intelligence. However, this council has become a retirement club of politicians, bureaucrats and academicians for making foreign trips. The council just arranges cultural festivals, cultural troops for artists, and seminars. It has not expanded Bharat’s strategic interests. For example, this council never attempted to bring back our artifacts siphoned off to other countries by illegal means. Also, the government has failed to stop cultural invasion by media, foreign funding, economic policies, etc. ICCR needs to be refurbished and reinvented. Its office bearers need to be given training on strengthening CI, the use of Indian heritage as a launch pad of influence in respective communities, and project Bharat positively.

Suggested Example: To establish a Cultural Intelligence Center in various countries.

Theme 9: Development Projects Linked to Bharatiya Languages, Culture, Heritage, Traditions and Arts

Bharatiya languages are considered passé; many children growing up in our cities cannot even speak the language of the state, or they speak HINGLISH at best. These children grow up in silos, despising (a defense mechanism) anything outside it, i.e., anything native to Bharat. They remain cut off from a majority of their countrymen, have no access to its rich repertoire of arts, literature, traditions or philosophy, and at best have a pedestrian knowledge (if not contempt) for their heritage. They end up uprooted and turn to any of Bollywood or Hollywood or Western pop for their quota of culture. The common ignorant question is “What is the use of learning Malayalam” (for example), and it applies to the arts, etc. The same goes for Bharatiya clothes, and the same goes for the environment and respect for it. The only way this can be turned around is by applications that provide incentive to practice this and make it part of their lives.

Suggested Examples:

1. Make bi-lingual signage (like in Canada) mandatory on products, medicines and, if required, the local state language where applicable. This includes all advertisements, hoardings, and business signage. This will create jobs in the private sector for translations, printing, etc.
2. Re-introduce civil-service exams in Hindi or local languages.
3.Minimum proficiency in at least one Bharatiya language to be tested for entry into centrally funded university courses, IITs, NITs, medicine, etc., at grade 12 level. This will create more jobs for teachers and examiners.
4. Restore Sanskrit in Kendriya Vidyalaya (up to grade 9), which was made optional under UPA a couple of years ago in preference for French and other foreign languages.
5.Discourage or phase out “International Schools” or give Chinmaya Vidyalaya and other major Dharmic Education Institutions support to expand their school systems.
6.Enforce Microsoft and other social media companies and cellphone handset manufacturers to create user interface software in Hindi (at least) and other recognized languages. This should have been enforced long ago to do business in India with simpler user interfaces. This is a huge disadvantage. Even small European countries are able to make these vendors do this. This will generate development and related jobs.
7. Recent Supreme Court ruling of quashing any attempt for native language to be made compulsory in primary classes - must be revisited and reversed if possible.

Theme 10:Any other unlisted themes and ideas.

Please list any other ideas that are not listed as part of this survey that you may feel are very important and relevant in today’s context.

For example,
1. Air quality issue: New Delhi's air quality was recently rated as being worse than that of Beijing. Similarly air quality in many big cities is an issue.
2.Our sacred rivers and water sources--filled with effluents from factories and cities need to have better treatment plants along with strict regulatory enforcement.
3. Green/Clean (solar, wind) power, river cleaning, and private sector waste treatment plantscan create jobs in the environment sector.
4. Implement policies suggested by the Western Ghats Ecology Expert Panel (WGEEP), also known as the Gadgil Commission Report for preserving forests in Kerala. This has been opposed by Communists, Congress and Church nexus in Kerala, due to pressure from minority vote banks.