This free survey is powered by
  1. Surveys
  2. 2013
  3. July
  4. F
  5. Feedback_Internals

Feedback_Internals

0%
Exit Survey
 
 
1.) Please rate the following catergories appropriately:
 
 
 
Ineffective Communicated necessary information Effectively communicated all details
Pre-Meeting Communications (Invitations, Website, Reminders, etc)
-
 
 
 
Inappropriate for meeting Adequate for meeting Excellent for meeting
Meeting Venue (Eaton Center, the Forum, the Atrium)
-
 
 
 
Ineffective Effective Meaningful and effective
Presentation Templates
-
 
 
 
Insufficient to provide meaningful feedback Allowed for meaningful feedback Provided for meaningful and actionable feedback
Content of Project Ranking Evaluations
-
 
 
 
Difficult to understand / use Adequate Appropriate and easy to use
Technology used for Project Ranking Evaluations (Questionpro.com)
-
 
 
 
Difficult to use / hindering to presenters Easy to use Effective and easy to use
Software used for questions during the presentations (Pollev.com)
-
 
 
 
Useless Fairly Useful Advantageous
Results from ranking surveys
-
 
 
 
Minimal Benefit Beneficial VOC Mutually beneficial exchange of information
Overall Benefit of the Meeting
-
 
 
 
2.) Did the roadmap schedule allow sufficient time to prepare for the validation meeting?
 
Yes
 
No
 
Other
 
 
 
 
3.) What is the ONE thing you can think of which would improve this meeting in the future?
   
 
 
 
4.) What is ONE thing that you enjoyed and would like to see at the next Product Roadmap Session?
   
 
 
 
General Comments: