This free survey is powered by
  1. Surveys
  2. 2013
  3. July
  4. F
  5. Feedback_Guests

Feedback_Guests

0%
Exit Survey
 
 
1.) Please rate the following categories appropriately:
 
 
Inappropriate for meeting Adequate for meeting Excellent for meeting
Meeting Venue (Eaton Center, the Forum, the Atrium)
-
 
 
 
Weak content Meaningful content Engaging content that sparked dialog
Content of the Presentations
-
 
 
 
Inconsistent formats Generally consistent Most were per standard
Presentation Consistency
-
 
 
 
Difficult to understand / use Adequate Appropriate and easy to use
Technology used for Project Ranking Evaluations (Questionpro.com)
-
 
 
 
Insufficient to provide meaningful feedback Allowed for meaningful feedback Provided for meaningful and actionable feedback
Content of Project Ranking Evaluations
-
 
 
 
Difficult to use Easy to use Effective and easy to use
Software used for questions during the presentations (Pollev.com)
-
 
 
 
Ineffective Communicated necessary information Effectively communicated all details
Pre-Meeting Communications (Invitations, Website, Reminders, etc)
-
 
 
 
Minimal benefit Voice was heard Mutually beneficial exchange of information
Overall Benefit of the Meeting
-
 
 
 
2.) What is the ONE thing you can think of which would improve this meeting in the future?
   
 
 
 
3.) What is ONE thing that you enjoyed and would like to see at the next Product Roadmap Session?
   
 
 
 
General Comments: